It seems to emphasize the value of Twitter's instantaneousness rather than the 140-word format. If the paper is valuing the websites instant updates of information, then surely wouldn't a less limiting format work in everyone's best interest?
It also seems vital that one "tags" your "tweets" (ugh) as you create them. However, these tags seem to be as variable as the writer who creates them.
Moreover, I just refuse to believe that Twitter can really prove to be useful.
No comments:
Post a Comment